TL;DR
Get comfort and care essentials delivered free — and shop member deals
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Access to Prime Big Deal Days deals on October 6–7
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
The U.S. Congress is using legislative measures to nullify the 2025 management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Critics warn this could set a precedent for rolling back protections on public lands nationwide, risking environmental and scientific loss.
The U.S. Congress is moving to nullify the 2025 management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, using the Congressional Review Act (CRA), a legislative tool that could significantly weaken protections for the area. This effort is drawing sharp criticism from scientists and conservationists who warn it could set a dangerous precedent for public lands nationwide.
More than 150 researchers and scientific institutions have signed a letter urging lawmakers to reject legislation that would overturn the protections established in 2025 for Grand Staircase-Escalante. The plan, which includes rules for protecting archaeological sites, wildlife habitats, and recreational areas, is currently targeted by Congress through the CRA, a fast-track legislative process that can nullify federal management plans.
Supporters of the move, including Utah Senators Celeste Maloy and Mike Lee, argue that the current management plan is overly restrictive and that returning to a previous, less protective management approach would better serve local communities. They emphasize that the land remains federal and protected, asserting that local voices should have more influence.
Critics, including conservation groups and legal experts, warn that this legislative action is an overreach and could lead to increased industrial activities such as mining and logging. They also caution that once protections are rolled back under the CRA, they are unlikely to be reinstated, leading to long-term environmental and recreational impacts.
Why It Matters
This development matters because it could weaken longstanding protections for one of the largest and most ecologically significant national monuments in the U.S. It risks opening the door to widespread reductions in federal land protections, which could affect biodiversity, scientific research, recreation, and local communities. The move reflects broader political battles over public land management and conservation priorities.
hiking backpack for national parks
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Background
Grand Staircase-Escalante was designated as a national monument in 1996 and expanded in 2000. The monument’s protections were reduced by the Trump administration in 2017 by half, but restored by the Biden administration in 2021. The 2025 management plan aimed to balance conservation with recreation and scientific research. The current legislative effort to overturn this plan marks the latest chapter in a decade-long political conflict over public land use.
“This CRA escalation is not isolated—it’s part of the broader agenda to weaken public lands governance from the inside out and enable the sale of America’s public lands.”
— Chris Hill, CEO of Conservation Lands Foundation
“This resolution uses Congress’s constitutional responsibility to check executive overreach and returns management to a plan that actually listens to the people on the ground.”
— Utah Senator Celeste Maloy
“If the CRA passes, it will cause chaos and uncertainty for a crown jewel of America’s public lands system.”
— Grant Stevens, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Remains Unclear
It is not yet clear whether Congress will pass the CRA resolutions targeting Grand Staircase-Escalante. The legislative process is ongoing, and opposition from environmental groups and some lawmakers could influence the outcome. Additionally, the full scope of potential impacts remains uncertain until any new management plan is officially enacted or rejected.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What’s Next
Next steps include congressional debates and votes on the CRA resolutions. If passed, the 2025 management plan would be nullified, potentially leading to changes in land use policies. Legal challenges and public protests may follow, and the Biden administration may seek to defend the protections through executive or legal channels.
reusable water bottles for hiking
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What is the Congressional Review Act?
The CRA is a legislative tool allowing Congress to review and potentially overturn recent federal regulations or management plans within a limited timeframe, effectively nullifying them if approved.
Why do critics oppose overturning the 2025 management plan?
Critics argue that the plan balances conservation with recreation and scientific research, and that rolling it back could lead to environmental degradation, loss of scientific opportunities, and increased industrial activity.
Could this affect other public lands?
Yes, experts warn that if the CRA is used to overturn protections for Grand Staircase-Escalante, it could set a precedent for similar actions across other national monuments and public lands, potentially weakening protections nationwide.
What are the potential environmental impacts of rolling back protections?
Possible impacts include increased mining, logging, off-road vehicle use, and habitat destruction, which could threaten biodiversity and disrupt ecosystems within the monument.
Cold & flu season Picks
humidifiers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
